查看原文
其他

乔什·勒纳:早期投资为何“猫冬”?| 对话

Josh Lerner 复旦金融评论 2022-07-08
■本文选自《复旦金融评论》

■作者:乔什·勒纳 (Josh Lerner),哈佛大学商学院终身教授、Jacob H.Schiff投资银行学教授、创业管理课程主任

■公众号:复旦金融评论

为什么说VC/PE对于新兴市场的影响更大?为什么VC/PE接纳新技术不是一朝一夕的事情?

本文共计2102字,预计阅读时长4分钟

拉至底部,阅读英文原文

乔什•勒纳

(Josh Lerner)

哈佛大学商学院终身教授
Jacob H.Schiff投资银行学教授
创业管理课程主任
最近几十年来,中国的私募股权市场在全球已占得一席,风险投资规模已超过美国成为全球第一。2018年,中国的风险投资主导亚洲市场,以创纪录的938亿美元领跑全球。但在过去一年,专注中国的风险投资资金额大幅下降,包括美元和人民币计价的募资总额126亿美元,仅为2018年全年的一半。中国作为全球第二大经济体,在人口结构演变、产业结构调整、颠覆性技术创新等大趋势下,热潮褪去的风险投资站在了进退攸关的转捩点。

FFR:近些年,发达国家与发展中国家的私募股权投资与风险投资整体趋势如何?

乔什·勒纳:纵观全球私募股权投资与风险投资行业,绝大部分资金都流入了发达国家,而中国则是例外。私募行业先在中国掀起一股热潮,风险投资紧随其后,总融资规模迅速扩张,发展势头迅猛。但在过去的一年间,中国风险投资规模大幅收缩,其原因尚不明确。这或许与国际局势有关,如贸易战,但或许也只是市场过热后的正常回调。回顾全球风险投资业的发展,类似的前期发展过热、后期规模收缩的现象时有发生,其发展特征如同钟摆,总在“过热”与“过冷”间来回摆动。因此,过去一年中国风险投资的大幅收缩,也可能只是该行业正常发展的一段历程。
FFR:您认为私募股权投资、风险投资、金融科技会在中国及其他法律体系和公司治理不够完善的新兴经济体发挥更大的作用吗?
乔什·勒纳:这是毋庸置疑的。在许多新兴国家,移动技术已渗透金融体系,发挥了巨大作用。相比于成熟经济体,风险投资、金融科技等在中国及其他新兴国家将有更广阔的发展与应用空间。相较之下,美国在这方面的技术应用则较为有限。其主要原因在于,美国金融体系已发展到较为成熟完善的阶段,若要引入新技术,整个金融系统都需要重新设计和改造,代价高昂。新技术将带来颠覆性变革,而在美国,现有制度的存在反而制约了新技术的应用。由于受到传统技术约束的程度较低,其金融机构与新兴企业在新技术的应用上态度更为开放、反应更加迅速,因此,风险投资、金融科技等在中国能得到更为广泛的应用。
FFR:近来金融科技在全球如火如荼,这对于私募股权投资与风险投资影响如何?
乔什·勒纳:尽管私募股权投资与风险投资公司在变革性的新兴技术上投资颇多,它们在自身的管理运作上依然趋向保守。因为它们通常有自己的一套运作体系,新技术的出现对其影响非常有限。种种监管约束的存在更加剧了它们吸收新技术的难度。这种情形在美国尤为明显,但在中国也不是例外。我并不否认近年来也有如众筹等创新融资方式的出现,但传统的风险投资与私募股权投资公司因其独特的运作方式,几乎不随新兴科技的出现而改变。
风险投资与私募股权投资公司或许也在尝试某些新技术,但由于业内诸多规则上的掣肘,对它们来说接纳新技术不是一朝一夕的事情。
但有一点毋庸置疑,私募股权投资和风险投资公司通过向市场提供资金来源,对金融科技的发展起到了巨大推动作用。这其中,受到政府对市场的管控与制约,并非所有投资都硕果累累,但风险投资对金融科技的推动作用是巨大的。
因此,总结来说,私募股权投资和风险投资公司对于新兴技术的发展影响巨大,但新兴技术的反向影响则非常有限。


向上滑动阅览英文原文


The Pendulum Swings: Early-stage Investors Pondering Whether to Hold or to Fold

JOSH LERNER

Jacob H. Schiff Professor of Investment BankingUnit Head, Entrepreneurial ManagementHarvard Business School

FFR: What generally is the big picture for PE/VC in emerging and developed economies in recent decades?

Prof. Lerner: When we look at venture capital and private equity, the bulk of the money, with the exception of China, has gone into the developed economies.

China’s industry has risen up particularly first inprivate equity, then in venture capital. There was a huge boom of funding there. But we have seen in the last 12 months, the amount of venture capital has contracted quite dramatically in China. The reason for the boom and sudden bust is still unclear. It could be related to political reasons like the trade war. It could also reflect that there was a degree of over-heating of the venture market in China. When we look at venture capitals globally, we often phenomenon of overheating and pull-back. It’s like a pendulum of clock swinging back and forth, too far in either direction. So, it is part of the normal process of the development of venture capital.

FFR: Do you think PE/VC and FinTech will play a bigger role in economies like China where legal system and corporate governance are not very developed?

Prof. Lerner: Yes, definitely. We have already seen mobile technologies ended up incorporated in the financial systemin many developing economies in very dramatic ways, far more than in the United States. This is in a large way because the system got to be designed around it. There was a leap-frogging aspect to it. In the same way, in other new technologies, Chinese financial institutions and start-ups will be quicker in many cases to adopt them, because there is less of a legacy technology that they are depending on. They are not constrained by the past.

FFR: FinTech seems trendy around the globe. What are the general implications for PE/VC?

Prof. Lerner: Even though the venture firms and private equity firms have invested in technologies that have changed the world, they tend to be quite conservative about how they themselves are managed. Most of them have very established ways that haven’t changed dramatically. That is particularly true in United States. And this is also true in China. This is not to say that there haven’t been crowd-funding and other kinds of innovations. But the traditional venture capital and private equity funds have their own way of doing things.

These groups might be embracing some of these new technologies. But this is complicated because there are lots of regulatory barriers blocking the way.

One thing that is certain is that venture capitals and private equity firms have been very dramatically pushing FinTech forward. Some investments have not been huge successes because of government regulations. But venture capital has certainly been playing a very big role in FinTech’s development.


*本采访由复旦大学经济学院李蔚博士在美国哈佛大学交流期间完成,编辑:蒋骋,经原作者授权,如需转载请联系授权并注明出处。

-END-



推荐阅读:

优惠订阅《复旦金融评论》2020全年纸质期刊!

原价352元,现价288元(4期含运费),并有限量礼品相赠。

↙↙您可以点击“阅读原文”,一键下单!

您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存