XL（3群，期刊编辑，中国）：对杂志来说，出版风险是首要考虑。文章那么多，我们杂志的拒稿率都接近90%，我肯定会挑出版风险小、瑕疵小的文章出版。署名有争议的、文章归属单位有争议的、涉密的、重复率高的，这些都是属于不能发表的。Dr. Zhang（4群，生物医学，美国）：只有熟悉流程，才能更好的保护自己的成果，及时发表文章。对于撤稿论文的处理流程，建议参照医学杂志编辑国际委员会（ICMJE）的处理方法，网址：http://www.icmje.org。 意见如下：Scientific Misconduct, Expressions of Concern, and RetractionScientific misconduct in research and non-research publications includes but is not necessarily limited to data fabrication; data falsification including deceptive manipulation of images; purposeful failure to disclose conflicts of interest; and plagiarism. Some people consider failure to publish the results of clinical trials and other human studies a form of scientific misconduct. While each of these practices is problematic, they are not equivalent. Each situation requires individual assessment by relevants take holders. When scientific misconduct is alleged, or concerns are otherwise raised about the conduct or integrity of work described in submitted or published papers, the editor should initiate appropriate procedures detailed by such committees such as the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), consider informing the institutions and funders, and may choose to publish an expression of concern pending the outcomes of those procedures. If the procedures involve an investigation at the authors’ institution, the editor should seek to discover the outcome of that investigation, notify readers of the outcome if appropriate, and if the investigation proves scientific misconduct, publish a retraction of the article. There may be circumstances in which no misconduct is proven, but an exchange of letters to the editor could be published to highlight matters of debate to readers.Expressions of concern and retractions should not simply be a letter to the editor. Rather, they should be prominently labelled, appear on an electronic or numbered print page that is included in an electronic or a print Table of Contents to ensure proper indexing, and include in their heading the title of the original article. Online, the retraction and original article should be linked in both directions and the retracted article should be clearly labelled as retracted in all its forms (Abstract, full text, PDF). Ideally, the authors of the retraction should be the same as those of the article, but if they are unwilling or unable the editor may under certain circumstances accept retractions by other responsible persons, or the editor may be the sole author of the retraction or expression of concern. The text of the retraction should explain why the article is being retracted and include a complete citation reference to that article. Retracted articles should remain in the public domain and be clearly labelled as retracted.The validity of previous work by the author of a fraudulent paper cannot be assumed. Editors may ask the author’s institution to assure them of the validity of other work published in their journals, or they may retract it. If this is not done, editors may choose to publish an announcement expressing concern that the validity of previously published work is uncertain.The integrity of research may also be compromised by inappropriate methodology that could lead to retraction.See COPE flowcharts for further guidance on retractions and expressions of concern. See Section IV.g.i. for guidance about avoiding referencing retracted articles.为了方便大家看，用Google Translate翻译如下（直接复制google翻译，没有做修改，表达不清楚请看上面英文原文。） 科学的不当行为，表示关注和撤稿研究和非研究出版物中的科学不端行为包括但不限于数据制作；伪造数据，包括对图像的欺骗性操纵；有意不披露利益冲突；剽窃。有些人认为未能发布临床试验和其他人体研究结果是一种科学不端行为。尽管每种做法都有问题，但它们并不等同。每种情况都需要相关利益相关者的单独评估。如果声称存在科学不端行为，或者对提交或发表的论文中描述的工作的进行或完整性存在其他担忧，则编辑应启动由诸如出版道德委员会（COPE）之类的委员会详细制定的适当程序，请考虑通知机构和出资者，并可以选择在这些程序结果公布之前发表关注的表达。如果程序涉及在作者机构进行的调查，则编辑应寻求发现该调查的结果，并在适当的情况下将结果通知读者，并且如果调查证明存在科学不端行为，请发表该文章的撤稿。在某些情况下，可能不会证明存在任何不当行为，但可以出版致编辑的信，以向读者强调辩论的内容。关注和撤稿的表达不应只是写给编辑的信。相反，它们应贴上醒目标签，并在电子或印刷目录中包含的电子或带编号的印刷页面上显示，以确保正确索引，并在其标题中包括原始文章的标题。在网上，撤回的文章和原始文章应在两个方向上进行链接，并且撤回的文章应以各种形式（摘要，全文，PDF）清楚地标记为撤回。理想情况下，撤稿的作者应与文章的作者相同，但如果他们不愿或无法编辑，在某些情况下编辑可能会接受其他负责人的撤稿，或者编辑可能是撤稿或表达的唯一作者值得关注。撤稿的文字应说明为何撤稿该文章，并包括对该文章的完整引用。撤回的文章应保留在公共领域，并明确标记为撤回。不能假设欺诈性论文作者的先前工作是有效的。编辑可以要求作者所在的机构向他们保证期刊中发表的其他作品的有效性，也可以撤回。如果不这样做，编辑可能会选择发布公告，以表达对先前发表的作品的不确定性的担忧。研究的完整性也可能会因不适当的方法论而受到损害，从而导致撤回研究。请参阅COPE流程图以获取有关撤稿和表达关注的进一步指导。有关避免引用撤稿文章的指导，请参见第IV.gi节。Dr. Zhang（4群，生物医学，美国）：对于撤稿的处理流程，可以出版道德委员会（COPE）制定的流程。如下图。